Skip to main content

R.I.H.D.

"In an effort to make a difference, we must do something different" Dr.Wendell L. Hylton
Home
Contact Us
Support RIHD
Help 4 Prisoner & Family
Prisoner Self-Help
Prisoner Before 1995
Prisoner After 1995
DOC Operating Cost
Women Prisoners
Juvenile Justice
Legal Assistance
Prison Transportation
2013-2014 Focus Bills
CommunityRestorationCampa
SentenceDisparityProject
GeneralAssemblyDirections
Events&Newsletter
News Worthy
More News
Former Felon/ReEntry
Restoration of Rights
VaRestorationLawsuit
Calendar
WEEKLY ACTION CALL
Words of Empowerment
Friends & Allies
Hours of Operation


 
 

‘A Step Forward’ for Jobseekers with Criminal Records

The mass incarceration of minority communities, and the resulting mass reentry and lifetime collateral consequences, have created the “perfect storm” to ensure that criminal record-based employment discrimination serves as a surrogate for race-based discrimination.
Jobseekers with criminal records are often at the “back of the line.” In the current economy, that line has grown considerably.
But on April 25, 2012, in a 4-1 bipartisan vote, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) showed tremendous leadership and courage by issuing a revised guidance encouraging the hiring of individuals with records by clarifying the application of Title VII to criminal records.
This decision gives jobseekers with criminal records a renewed opportunity to successfully enter the labor market.
But the by-product of mass incarceration—mass reentry—means that this year alone 700,000 people will return to their communities from prison.
Millions more will cycle through our courts and jails or be placed under some other form of correctional supervision. More than half of these men and women come from and return to impoverished communities that are under resourced and ill-equipped to respond to the large number of returning citizens.
On their return to the community, these individuals are expected to find and maintain gainful employment. And, let there be no mistake, those that can work want to work.
However, over the past few decades, state and local legislatures have promulgated a wide array of laws and policies that make it increasingly difficult for people with criminal records to enter the labor market successfully— even for those who have fully paid their debt to society and have demonstrated that they are not a threat and are capable of becoming productive, tax-paying citizens.
Legal restrictions, occupational bars, inadvertent and deliberate employment discrimination practices, and the cultural stigma associated with having a criminal record have prevented many of these people – especially those who come from economically distressed communities of color – from obtaining employment and other necessities of life.
In addition, researchers from around the country confirm that the majority of private- sector employers have little or no interest in hiring people with criminal records, especially those recently released from state and federal correctional facilities.
When many individuals inevitably fail to reintegrate and are re-incarcerated, they are not the only ones who suffer. So do their families, communities and indeed the entire country; valuable lives are wasted, the public is less safe, and justice is diminished.
Finding effective ways to manage their reentry into society and the workforce is critical to promoting public safety and curbing recidivism rates and the high costs of re-incarceration.
The new guidance supersedes the original version issued in 1987, and reminds employers that criminal record policies have a disparate impact based on race and national origin.
According to the new guidelines, employers must consider the age and seriousness of the offense, and its relevance to the job the applicant is applying for.Employers must also now conduct individualized assessments when screening applicants with criminal records.
This new provision will offer qualified jobseekers a chance to explain their involvement with the criminal justice system, in addition to providing them an opportunity to share evidence of rehabilitation. This will help to level the playing field and offer jobseekers with criminal records a chance to compete on the merits, once their criminal record is taken into account.
Surprisingly, the new guidance also encourages employers to consider recent research on “desistance,” when designing their human resource policies. This is an especially important provision, since most employers rely on often ill-informed and misguided notions about risk and recidivism.
The EEOC's action is a welcome step forward.
The labor market has changed considerably since the EEOC’s last issued guidance. Changes in technology have greatly increased employer access to personal background information and more small and medium-sized employers obtain criminal background information.
According to The Fortune Society’s research, and its experiences working with employers to place its reentry clients, businesses want to hire individuals with records, and are looking for knowledge on how to make informed decisions on using criminal justice information.
EEOC's updated guidance will provide that information, and will aid these employers by expanding the labor pool of much-needed qualified workers
Glenn E. Martin is Vice President of Development and Public Affairs and Director of the David Rothenberg Center for Public Policy at The Fortune Society, Inc., a non-profit organization devoted to the successful reentry and reintegration of individuals with criminal histories. He welcomes comments from readers. Follow him on Twitter @GlennEMartin
 
 
 
MARCH 2012
Public Opinion on Sentencing and
Corrections Policy in America
1. American voters believe too many people are in prison and the nation spends
too much on imprisonment.
2. Voters overwhelmingly support a variety of policy changes that shift non-violent
offenders from prison to more effective, less expensive alternatives.
3. Support for sentencing and corrections reforms (including reduced prison terms)
is strong across political parties, regions, age, gender, and racial/ethnic groups.
2012 polling, consistent with 2010 research, indicates that voters are concerned first and foremost
with keeping communities and people safe. Without question, voters want a strong public safety
system where criminals are held accountable and there are consequences for illegal activities. They
also believe that these goals can be reached while reducing the size and cost of the prison system.
A national public opinion survey conducted in January 2012, along with similar surveys in Georgia,
Missouri, and Oregon, found those attitudes persist and revealed opinions on specific policy solutions.
Key takeaways
“Some of the money that we are spending on locking up low-risk, non-violent inmates should be
shifted to strengthening community corrections programs like probation and parole.”